RUSSIAN FEDERATION - OECD

198kB Size 2 Downloads 13 Views

IV.10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: RUSSIAN FEDERATION OECD SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY OUTLOOK 2012 © OECD 2012 369 Figure 10.34. …
IV.10.

SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: RUSSIAN FEDERATION

RUSSIAN FEDERATION Hot STI issues ●

Increasing firms’ innovation activities and strengthening the research activities of universities



Better exploiting the commercial potential of public-sector R&D.



Improving framework conditions for entrepreneurship and innovation.

General features of the STI system: The Russian Federation has a longstanding S&E tradition and many centres of excellence. It has a strong international reputation in key S&T fields such as aerospace, nuclear science and engineering, and advanced software. The bulk of Russian R&D is still performed in state-owned branch research institutes, which are mostly separate from industrial firms and HEIs. The share of public research funded by industry is slightly above the OECD median but the relative number of patents filed by universities and public labs is on a par with the bottom OECD countries (Panel 1 ( o ) ( p ) ). The picture for international collaboration is mixed: 31% of scientific articles are produced with international co-authorship (1(q)), which is on the low side, and 22% of PCT patent applications are produced with international collaboration (1(r)), which is close to the OECD median but reflects in part the patenting activities of international firms operating in the country. In spite of recent policy initiatives, overly restrictive regulation, exceptions to the rule of law, and a lack of competition are still major disincentives to entrepreneurship (1(j)). The tertiary attainment rate of 54% is very high (1(s)), well above any OECD country, but PISA scores in science for 15-year-olds are low (1(t)). Furthermore, the ageing of researchers and engineers raises concerns for future R&D capabilities. Russian RTA is close to the OECD average, with marked increases in nanotechnologies in recent years (Panel 3). ICT infrastructures are weak with 11 subscribers to fixed broadband networks per 100

inhabitants (1(k)). The e-government readiness index is below the OECD median (1(n)). Recent developments in STI expenditures: GERD was 1.16% of GDP in 2010, a level significantly below the OECD median. The business enterprise sector funded just 26% of GERD in 2010, and government funded 70%, following a steady rise from 55% in 2000. R&D expenditure funded by government grew at an annual rate of 7.9% in the five years to 2010. Overall STI strategy: After the onset of the financial crisis in 2008, a new strategic approach to Russia’s modernisation emerged, with key long-term priorities for the national STI complex as well as a new framework for its governance. At the same time, a broader concept of innovation is being promoted, e nc a p su l a t e d in t he M in i s t ry of E c on o m i c Development’s Innovation Development Strategy of the Russian Federation to 2020. Its objectives are to further develop human capital, stimulate innovation activities in the business sector, create a climate conducive to innovation in the public sector, increase the efficiency and dynamism of R&D, and promote international STI co-operation. In addition, the State Programme for Development of Science and Technology for 2012-20 has been established. Its goal is to concentrate resources on creating a competitive and effective R&D sector as a key driver for technological modernisation of the economy. In particular, it extends public support for priority t e chn o log y a re a s an d in t e r- s e c t o ra l S & T infrastructure.

Key figures Labour productivity, GDP per hour worked in USD, 2010 (annual growth rate, 2005-10 ) Environmental productivity, GDP per unit of CO2 emitted in USD, 2009 (annual growth rate, 2005-09)

368

20.6 (+3.3) 1.75 (+3.1)

GERD, as % of GDP, 2010 (annual growth rate, 2005-10) GERD publicly financed, as % of GDP, 2010 (annual growth rate, 2005-10)

1.16 (+5.2) 0.82 (+7.9)

OECD SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY OUTLOOK 2012 © OECD 2012

OECD SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY OUTLOOK 2012 © OECD 2012

or

al

ad

at

oc

te ns in to le

n

pl en t(

g

v)

)

t)

(u

% )(

in

% )(

s)

at io

te

in

in

g

p

er

in

x(

j)

(i)

h)

)

(f ) (g

P) de

GD

)

)

e)

(d

(c

)(

P)

)

b)

)( P)

DP

GD

GD

rG

hi

(p rs

ld

er

er

pe

(p

(p

l(

eu

so en

ar

ks

ita

ar

P)

P)

DP

GD

GD

rG

er

er

(a

)(

P)

DP

GD

rG

pe

(p

(p

s( es

or

ap

pr

ye tr e

5

m

ec

de

ls

re

ili

st

i tu

na

am

ve

tf

ur

en

n

nt ha of

en

Tr a

at

in

ur

nd

jo

er

pe

(p

s(

re

tie

i tu

si

nd

er

pe

le

ex

r ti

iv

pe

un

ex

&D

Ve st se

es Ea

sl

cp

eR

di

at

Tr ia

or

ua

&D

-q

0

D

50

R&

sR

op

es

rp

m

co

ic

To p

bl

et

sin

th

f ir

0

Bu 50

ns

nt

To p

ic

Pa

bl

Pu

OECD median

m

e(

er

nc

% )(

q) (% )( r)

l(

g

ve

in

ne

ie

gi

oy

en

sc

le

nt

)

o)

Pu

Business R&D and innovation

m

nd

si

ea

er

n

te

)

n)

(p

)(

x(

(m

P)

)

(l)

(k

(% )(

GD

ip

er

de

DP

in

n)

n)

n)

io

t io

rG

sh

(p

or

tio

pa

ca

o-

th

bs

au

la

pe

ss

la

at

io

Knowledge flows and commercialisation

ta

nc

rm

ie

r fo

sc

pe

lc

o-

ic

du

na

lc

bl

ne

pu

s(

di

po

re

ea

er

at

ul

ul

op

op

rp

rp

pe

i tu

tr

(p

nd

ye

io

na

ar

at

io

r ti

in

p

t io

ra

to

rn

at

te

te

rn

at

In

te

pe

pu

ex

en

s)

m

m

rn

te

nd

D

ve

sa

R&

tie

pa

n

cu

t io

n

ld

io

ar -o

ua

ye

ul

si

ic

In

er

bl

go

ys

pe

s(

s(

er

er

r ib

r ib

sc

sc

su

ss

E-

ou

d

su

Middle range of OECD values

S& T

gr

15 -

op

iv

pu

un

ed

by

nc

tp

d

ul

il e

na

om

an

d

Internet for innovation

Ad

sf

-f i

on

db

an

Science base

ct

nt

ut

oa

db

Top/bottom 5 OECD values

Do

te

(a

br

oa

Bottom half OECD

ry

ks

ss

br

Top half OECD

st

or

le

d

Bottom half OECD

du

tw

ir e

xe

Top half OECD

Pa

In

Ne

W

Fi

IV.10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Figure 10.34. Science and innovation in the Russian Federation Panel 1. Comparative performance of national science and innovation systems, 2011 Russian Federation

a. Competences and capacity to innovate Entrepreneurship

200

100 150

50

0

b. Interactions and human resources for innovation

Human resources

200

100 150

50

0

Note: Normalised index of performance relative to the median values in the OECD area (Index median = 100).

369

IV.10.

SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: RUSSIAN FEDERATION

STI policy governance: Several ministries support R&D and innovation, notably the Ministry of Education and Science and the Ministry of Economic Development. At the same time, the impact of the government’s High Technology and Innovation

around Moscow and St. Petersburg. The government has various schemes to promote regional clusters, including special economic zones, techno-parks and innovation and technology centres. In 2010, the government announced the creation of the new

Commission, as well as the President’s Commission for Modernisation and Technological Development of Russia’s Economy, is growing. They have become the main locus of policy decisions, with strong coordination powers in matters relating to R&D and innovation policies.

Skolkovo Innovation City, which offers incentives for the establishment of foreign subsidiaries.

Science base: The public science base is large and dominated by industrial branch institutes. The institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences also account for a significant share of publicly performed R&D and conduct the sorts of basic research carried out in HEIs in many OECD countries. Research outputs, as measured by the number of publications in scientific journals (1 (c) ) and triadic patent applications (1(f)) are weak. Efforts to strengthen research in HEIs include the launch of the programmes Research and Academic Teaching Potential of an Innovative Russia (2009-13) and Federal Targeted Support to Leading High Schools (2010-12). Much of the new investment aims to establish an elite cadre of research-led HEIs, similar to those of many OECD countries. Business R&D and innovation: Business R&D is concentrated in larger companies, especially in resource-based industries. Besides traditional areas of excellence (e.g. nuclear energy, aerospace), these activities mainly support modernisation and technological renewal for productivity growth. Apart from a few high-technology firms (especially in the ICT sector), SMEs pursue non-R&D innovation strategies including technology adoption. Current policy practice for fostering innovation is twofold. A f i r s t g ro up o f m e a s u re s s e e k s t o rel i eve administrative barriers and improve framework conditions (including taxation and customs regimes) to stimulate innovation. A second set of measures targets major state-owned enterprises, notably the Innovation Enforcement initiative (2011-12), which obliges them to formulate and carry out innovation development strategies. Clusters and regional policies: Russian R&D and innovation activities are largely concentrated in and

370

Knowledge flows and commercialisation: Limited cooperation between science, education and industry hampers innovation. The legal framework has been recently amended to promote co-operation. A series of federal laws (2009-11) encourages the creation of spin-offs from universities and research institutes, provides co-funding of research co-operation between companies and universities, and offers assistance in developing university innovation infrastructure. The Technology Platforms Initiative (2011) aims at fostering knowledge exchange and pre-competitive co-operation by enterprises, research institutes, universities and design bureaus along competitively selected thematic areas. Globalisation: Russian innovation system has much to gain from stronger international connections. Among non-members the scale of the country’s participation in the EU Framework Programmes is second only to that of the United States. At the same time, the government has continued efforts to stimulate inward FDI: in 2011, the need for prior government approval for foreign acquisitions in identified strategic sectors was removed. Emerging technologies: With traditional strengths in the materials and physical sciences, the government has placed great importance on becoming a world leader in nanotechnology. Federal investments increased with the creation of Rusnano in 2007. Significant support for emerging technologies also come from by the Russian Technologies State C o r p o ra t i o n a n d t h e S t a t e A t o m i c E n e rg y Corporation. Green innovation: Owing to Russian high energy intensity, the government aims to implement measures to address energy efficiency. The Federal Law on Energy Saving and Increasing Energy Efficiency (2009) was the first step to promote International Energy Agency standards in the country. Further initiatives towards an energy-efficient economy are OECD SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY OUTLOOK 2012 © OECD 2012

IV.10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: RUSSIAN FEDERATION

included in the Energy Strategy of Russia for the period to 2030. At the same time, investments in developing environment-related technologies have

increased through dedicated programmes such as the New Generation Nuclear Energy Technologies (2011-15).

Figure 10.34. Science and innovation in the Russian Federation

Panel 2. Structural composition of BERD, 2009 As a % of total BERD OECD median Russian Federation

Panel 3. Revealed technology advantage in selected fields, 2007-09 Index based on PCT patent applications

OECD median (2005) Russian Federation (2005)

OECD median

Russian Federation

BRIICS

Russian Federation (1997-99)

2.0 1.1

1.8

Industry 100

1.5

80

Low-knowledge services

60

0.4

% of PCT patent applications filed by universities and PRIs

High-tech manufacturing

40

1.0

20 0

0.5 High-knowledge market services

Mediumto low-tech manufacturing

0.0 Bio- and nanotechnologies

Services

ICT

Environment-related technologies

Panel 4. Overview of national innovation policy mix, 2010 Russian Federation

Russian Federation (2005)

OECD sample median

Public research

University-centred (1)

Public lab-centred (1)

Basic research oriented (1)

Applied/experimental research oriented (1)

Civil oriented (2)

Defence oriented (2)

Generic (2)

Thematic (2)

Institutional block funding (3)

Project-based funding (3)

Public support to business R&D and innovation

Support to business R&D and innovation (4)

Support to public research (4)

Direct funding of business R&D (5) 100/ 0 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Indirect funding of business R&D (5) 75/25

50/50

25/75

0/100

Balance as a percentage of the sum of HERD and GOVERD. Balance as a percentage of total GBAORD. Balance as a percentage of total funding to national performers. Balance as a percentage of the sum of HERD and GOVERD funded by government and higher education and components of (5). Balance as a percentage of the sum of indirect funding of business R&D and innovation through R&D tax incentives and direct funding of BERD through grants, contracts and loans.

Source: See reader’s guide and methodological annex.

1 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932690776

OECD SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY OUTLOOK 2012 © OECD 2012

371

Comments